“The FISA court is just a rubber stamp”, I keep hearing this from those that
think the government is seeking to spy on and control the American
people. Critics point to the extremely high approval rate for
government requests for warrants which they say indicates that the
court is just a rubber stamp. But there are two possibilities for the
high approval rate, either the court is a rubber stamp and approves
all requests just because the government is asking OR the requests the court receives are in
fact valid with due cause so the court has no reason to turn them down.
There
is another piece of data that can help us determine which of the two
above possibilities is more likely and that is the number of requests
for warrants. If the court was just a rubber stamp, you would expect
to see a large number of requests; if warrants were automatic, the government would abuse the
process and would be requesting warrants to look into dealings of all
kinds, legitimate and illegitimate resulting in a large number of warrant requests. If, on the other hand, the court
was actually judging warrant requests professionally in a case by
case manner, you would expect to see a relatively small number of
warrants requested. In that case the government would only request
warrants in a few instances where they are justified and would not
abuse the system knowing that to do so would result in a high turn
down rate. The fact that there are only a small number of warrant
requests and a very high approval rate would tend to support the
likelihood that the court is not simply a rubber stamp and that the
government is not requesting warrants except where they are
justified.
No comments:
Post a Comment